A Lot of Weirdness From The Latest Trump Shooting

Greetings and Salutations!
So many odd things about this hooter at the Correspondent’s Dinner last night. First off, and I know I sound like a wee bit of a crank, but YET AGAIN the shooter is of the three-named-variety. Cole Tomas Allen, age 31 from California is the suspect that they bagged on-scene without killing him

Bad luck that.

The over/under odds on his ‘suicide’ is about 75-25 that he dies in custody BEFORE he can go on trial or be made public.

I know, I know the three-named assassin thing again
Problem is, it does seem to be a ‘thing’…

As the recently declassified files showed after JFK, the calling out the ssin by his first, middle and last name is a mnemonic device to ‘fix’ the name of the patsy/shooter in the general publics mind so people remember the name, the action, and automatically do not question the validity of the story being ‘sold’ to them…

Especially since this dood?

I read his ‘manifesto’
I’m not going to reproduce it here. DiveMedic has it HERE

The things that strike me as odd in it?
Well first off, he claims “While I’m discussing this, I’ll also go over my expected rules of engagement (probably in a terrible format, but I’m not military so too bad.)

And yet towards the end, when he’s ranting about the utter lack of security at the Hotel prior to the event, he states “Like, if I was an Iranian agent, instead of an American citizen, I could have brought a damn Ma Deuce in here and no one would have noticed shit.” (Bold Mine)

From what I can tell, and according to his history and background, he was a geek. Degrees in science, gamer, game designer. Granted a lot of the ‘common vernacular’ out there in the video game world as such, maybe his use of the term “Ma Deuce” is just something he picked up.

However, given his supposed background?
A highly intelligent hardcore Anti-Christian leftist (from California no less!), who by all rights would be strictly anti-military? It’s odd enough that that phrase stood out to me in his rantings.

For those unfamiliar with the term, ‘Ma Deuce’ is the military’s nickname for the M2A/A2 .50cal Heavy Machinegun. Per the AI:

“Ma Deuce” is the affectionate nickname for the Browning M2 .50 caliber heavy machine gun, derived from a phonetic play on its M2 designation (M-two → Ma Deuce). It refers to the weapon’s “maternal” reliability and its role as the primary, dependable heavy weapon of the U.S. military since World War II.”

So for this guy, who claims no prior DotMil service, uses the term for a weapon that is NOT use in a normal day-to-day conversation…

Jes’ Sayin’

That and the fact he was wearing an IDF sweatshirt on his Instagram account before it got scrubbed:

Funny that innit?
I wonder what mommas background is?
He stated himself he’s ‘half black’
Any bets that Dad is the ‘dark meat’ in that sammich?
And mom?
Well Judaism is passed down from the mothers side, not the dads… Things that make you go “Hmmmmn”

So, otherwise, things are good.
I managed to get a shower in today and hosed off Muldoon as well. Which of course right after was dinner time, at which he spewed on me again… Now I’m remembering why personal hygiene takes a back seat when you have a wee baby… why get clean only to get puked on 5 minutes afterwards?

Thank God for Dude Wipes.
Those things rock!
So More Later
Big Country

9 thoughts on “A Lot of Weirdness From The Latest Trump Shooting”

  1. You lookin’ good there. As to that puke, I think he was a gun nut reader. His sis said he had guns and had done some training. It evidently must have been the usual week-end or week-long rent an expert stuff. His tactics were horrible. If he had not shot the SS cop I would be thinking this was a false flag event.
    We’ll see, as the Zen master said.

  2. “ I know, I know the three-named assassin thing again
    Problem is, it does seem to be a ‘thing’…”

    You don’t have a middle name? Everyone I know has a middle name. They just don’t get used until someone reads it off your record or your mother wants to scold you.

    1. True enough, but the middle name thing is ALWAYS invoked when someone takes a shot at a politician. And only a politician. Do we know Luigi Mangione’s middle name? Klebold and Harris at Columbine? Lanza at Sandyhook? The Minneapolis transfaggot that aired out the Christian school? No, no, no, and no. Hell, I don’t even remember the beltway sniper getting the three name treatment back in the day.

      So, what we have here is a stylistic flourish applied only to naming killers of politically powerful people, and no one else. Hell, we even have a special word for it: assassination. If I [hypothetically] take up on a rooftop and snipe the local Chad Thundercock who I found out was banging my girlfriend from 300 yards, it’s a murder, not an assassination. Again, why the distinction? Well, because the ruling class wants it that way. Nothing else can account for the differences in the naming of the crime or the perp who committed it, except that a certain class of arrogant cocksuckers has placed themselves in a uniquely elevated position over the rest of us, and want special privileges because of it. Well, I say fuck ’em.

      1. Important, oft overlooked point, BRD. One of my careers was teaching high school English, yet I had never considered this.

    2. Gah, my comment must’ve gone in the moderation stack. BCE, if you see this, please set it free.

  3. The VAST majority of people in America have three names. So identifying someone using all three is not unusual. And it helps prevent MISIDENTIFYING someone. So this is NOT some conspiracy theory. When you get pulled over on a traffic stop your info is run using all three of your names…to insure accuracy. Odds are good he’s just another highly intelligent idiot. Good at a few things but totally useless otherwise. A typical leftist wind up toy radicalized by leftist indoctrination from kindergarten through college. Not some part of a conspiracy. Just one of countless mindless morons who have subscribed to the lefts insanity. And not tactically competent. He’s lucky to be alive but I doubt he gets whacked. Because I doubt he’s anything more than another gullible idiot hanging out at the Democrat Underground website.

    1. It isn’t a conspiracy, and it doesn’t need to be. It is a conscious choice made by TPTB in publicly identifying those who tried (and sometimes succeeded) in killing a person of a specific class; namely the political class. It is a sort of fringe benefit of being a political whore, in that if you get killed by a prole, that proles name is forever cemented in the societal consciousness by using their full name. Apparently it is some sort of psychological shorthand that when invoked, is intended to signify the target is an especially double plus ungood piece of shit.

      And yet other politically motivated killings (which are never referred to as assassinations, incidentally) are not given to using the “three name thing”. Tim McVeigh? Nope. Ted Kaczinsky? Nope again. The only distinction being that they killed other “commoners”, so the crime and the etching of it’s perpetrators name upon the national collective memory do not receive the special elevation that one gets from taking out a truly prime target like a president, senator or judge.

      Sure, there are exceptions. John Hinckley; though I bet if he’d actually killed Reagan, we’d all know his middle name today. James Earl Ray is the inverse exception. MLK wasn’t a politician in the proper sense of the word, but he was a specially anointed smooth talking nigga who enjoyed beating prostitutes in his hotel room, so his killer, er, “assassin” was bestowed with the “three name monty”.

      It’s kind of a scarlet letter, and only employed when the person killed is deemed worthy of it’s employ. That “worthiness” is almost exclusively reserved to the domain of politicians, which is really kind of a bad joke.

  4. That guy must be a few rocks from a full load.

    Baby’s do run at both ends more or less constantly. Wife runs an in home day care and we have two little snot factories around to refresh my baby knowledge. Yeah me.

    I thought after butler they did a better job of covering the president, not in evidence this time.

    As to the 60 minutes interview, what a crock that was. These “critical” journalist need to have some real life put on them.

Leave a Reply to Homeless Mack Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Verified by MonsterInsights