A Lot of Weirdness From The Latest Trump Shooting

48 thoughts on “A Lot of Weirdness From The Latest Trump Shooting”

1. You lookin’ good there. As to that puke, I think he was a gun nut reader. His sis said he had guns and had done some training. It evidently must have been the usual week-end or week-long rent an expert stuff. His tactics were horrible. If he had not shot the SS cop I would be thinking this was a false flag event.
   We’ll see, as the Zen master said.

   1. Read somewhere that Cole hit the SS agent center of body mass while sprinting? That sounds like someone with some kinetic training.

2. “ I know, I know the three-named assassin thing again
   Problem is, it does seem to be a ‘thing’…”

   You don’t have a middle name? Everyone I know has a middle name. They just don’t get used until someone reads it off your record or your mother wants to scold you.

   1. True enough, but the middle name thing is ALWAYS invoked when someone takes a shot at a politician. And only a politician. Do we know Luigi Mangione’s middle name? Klebold and Harris at Columbine? Lanza at Sandyhook? The Minneapolis transfaggot that aired out the Christian school? No, no, no, and no. Hell, I don’t even remember the beltway sniper getting the three name treatment back in the day.

      So, what we have here is a stylistic flourish applied only to naming killers of politically powerful people, and no one else. Hell, we even have a special word for it: assassination. If I [hypothetically] take up on a rooftop and snipe the local Chad Thundercock who I found out was banging my girlfriend from 300 yards, it’s a murder, not an assassination. Again, why the distinction? Well, because the ruling class wants it that way. Nothing else can account for the differences in the naming of the crime or the perp who committed it, except that a certain class of arrogant cocksuckers has placed themselves in a uniquely elevated position over the rest of us, and want special privileges because of it. Well, I say fuck ’em.

      1. Important, oft overlooked point, BRD. One of my careers was teaching high school English, yet I had never considered this.

         1. Yea look at Lee Harvey Oswald compared to who shot him Jack Rubenstein and then Timothy McVeigh who allegedly blew up the Murrah Building who were federal agents but not politicians…

      2. ” … was banging my girlfriend from 300 yards”
         What a man! 😉

         1. Heh. Think I missed a comma there. Good catch.

         2. I wouldn’t be able to take the shot. My applause would interfere.

      3. Sometimes it’s not assassination it is “change you can believe in”.

      4. JohnHinckley

         1. John F Hinkley Jr as I recall… that’s what he was referred to in the news, but that’s going a ways back dude.

            1. At the time his father was still alive, so the jr was necessary. Jr. is not a middle name!

   2. Gah, my comment must’ve gone in the moderation stack. BCE, if you see this, please set it free.

3. The VAST majority of people in America have three names. So identifying someone using all three is not unusual. And it helps prevent MISIDENTIFYING someone. So this is NOT some conspiracy theory. When you get pulled over on a traffic stop your info is run using all three of your names…to insure accuracy. Odds are good he’s just another highly intelligent idiot. Good at a few things but totally useless otherwise. A typical leftist wind up toy radicalized by leftist indoctrination from kindergarten through college. Not some part of a conspiracy. Just one of countless mindless morons who have subscribed to the lefts insanity. And not tactically competent. He’s lucky to be alive but I doubt he gets whacked. Because I doubt he’s anything more than another gullible idiot hanging out at the Democrat Underground website.

   1. It isn’t a conspiracy, and it doesn’t need to be. It is a conscious choice made by TPTB in publicly identifying those who tried (and sometimes succeeded) in killing a person of a specific class; namely the political class. It is a sort of fringe benefit of being a political whore, in that if you get killed by a prole, that proles name is forever cemented in the societal consciousness by using their full name. Apparently it is some sort of psychological shorthand that when invoked, is intended to signify the target is an especially double plus ungood piece of shit.

      And yet other politically motivated killings (which are never referred to as assassinations, incidentally) are not given to using the “three name thing”. Tim McVeigh? Nope. Ted Kaczinsky? Nope again. The only distinction being that they killed other “commoners”, so the crime and the etching of it’s perpetrators name upon the national collective memory do not receive the special elevation that one gets from taking out a truly prime target like a president, senator or judge.

      Sure, there are exceptions. John Hinckley; though I bet if he’d actually killed Reagan, we’d all know his middle name today. James Earl Ray is the inverse exception. MLK wasn’t a politician in the proper sense of the word, but he was a specially anointed smooth talking nigga who enjoyed beating prostitutes in his hotel room, so his killer, er, “assassin” was bestowed with the “three name monty”.

      It’s kind of a scarlet letter, and only employed when the person killed is deemed worthy of it’s employ. That “worthiness” is almost exclusively reserved to the domain of politicians, which is really kind of a bad joke.

      1. Ryan Routh

         1. As I pointed out, there are periodic exceptions. No, I don’t know exactly why. But the three name monty is invoked frequently enough and under very specific circumstances to call it a “rule” or a “policy” being applied, and not a mere coincidence.

            Propagandists choose their words and images very carefully, to drive a desired narrative and manipulate the thoughts of those they are targeting. The three name thing is a “device” that falls into that same category.

            Thinking further on it now, if an assassin, or attempted assassin chooses a target that is widely disliked by the press and the propaganda arm of the deep state, they may choose not to use the middle name of the perp when discussing the matter, just to take away the distinction that is normally imparted. Conversely, they do the three name thing when someone they like is killed (or at least an attempt is made at doing so).

            After all, it is my contention that the whole underlying reason for the three name thing is to paint the perp as the worst of the worst, while simultaneously painting a halo on the victim (in the matter of public perception). It’s a sort of shorthand used to get the masses to have specific ideas about buth the perp and the target. Not sure I can explain it more clearly than that.

            Hell, look at how many people think this was staged by Trump to try and bump his popularity again, as he got a huge benefit after the Butler PA attempt. Of course, that was during the campaign, and not after he’d been in office for a year and a half fucking things up (as is the perception of not only his opponents, but now many if his former supporters as well).

            Nearly the entirety of what see presented to us concerning current events is just a big show, scripted (often poorly) and produced to drive public opinion. It seems that those making the decisions on where to take the plot often miss the mark, but they may well have reasons for doing that too.

            1. Or it could be that there are hundreds of John Booths in the country. When someone commits an evil act it’s important to be precise, less others share in the blame that’s not theirs.

            2. By the way BRD, I always enjoy your take on issues, just a friendly discussion!

            3. No problem, I enjoy a gentlemanly debate. If it weren’t for the very specific pattern of applying the use of middle names to a very particular class of criminals (those who shoot politicians) but virtually never outside of that specific circumstance, I’d have no argument with your point. But this is almost never done with murderers who kill an average schmuck (the proverbial John Q. Public like you or I) at the mall, on the street, or even dozens of school kids as they cower in their classrooms.

               If the justice system is so concerned about precisely identifying the perp in one case, why not any of the others? There is very clearly a distinction being made based upon who the victim was, and I’ve simply put forth my rationale for why I believe that is.

4. That guy must be a few rocks from a full load.

   Baby’s do run at both ends more or less constantly. Wife runs an in home day care and we have two little snot factories around to refresh my baby knowledge. Yeah me.

   I thought after butler they did a better job of covering the president, not in evidence this time.

   As to the 60 minutes interview, what a crock that was. These “critical” journalist need to have some real life put on them.

5. Dude Wipes are the shit…no pun intended.

6. My brother and I both have the same middle name. It cut down on our father’s yelling at us. When he hollered “Wesley!”, it stopped both of us in our tracks. When we heard that we knew we were screwing up.
   How did a certifiable midwit get into Cal Tech? Diversity. You can tell he’s not smart by his strategy and his tactics, so we know he didn’t earn it. When at first they claimed he was an “engineer”, I admit, I laughed out loud. The Israeli shirt is wonderful from the conspiracy POV, except the Pres. appears to be their (Israel’s) boy. More’s the pity.
   I don’t buy the 75-25 odds, but I will when they get down to 3-1.

   1. Ah, but Donald, after being confronted with well-reasoned resistance from his military advisers (at least those not fired for doing their damn jobs as_strategists_, and not merely tacticians), might be perceived by Our Greatest Ally as wavering in his dedication toward Their God-Ordained Mission of the instantiation of Greater Israel, and stood in need of a reminder of how they take out heads of state who get in Their way on the regular. So this wind up toy, IDF sweatshirt and all, might be just such a warning. Next time, should one be necessary, the paradigm would be to “Charlie Kirk” him. Netanyahu and company are some ruthless fucks, something never to be lost sight of.

7. This has family photos:
   https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15766135/Cole-Tomas-Allen-charges-White-House-Correspondents-Dinner-shooting.html

   1. Half black
      Half Jewish (from the mother’s side)

      Need one say more?

      1. And as jewishness is traditionally reckoned matrilinealy, this makes him a jew.

         Be interesting to discover how much black daddy remains a factor in his life, and if the answer is not much, well then…

         1. Traditionally the lineage was from the father’s side; you know, like Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and so on. Look at the offspring of Jacob for example – didn’t much matter if it were from Leah, Rachel, or one of the “hand maids”.

            Not until AFTER Jesus was the switch made to mother’s side; it is a talmudic invention.

   2. I looked at this article just now. I haven’t really been following this “assassination attempt.”So I knew this guys mom would be white. Well there she is right in the article. Liberal white mom. I bet she wears her pussy hat around the house all day while listening to MSNBC.

      The kid, some kind of super scholar, in one photo is wearing the red necktie. I could be way off on this but I seem to remember reading somewhere that this red tie is gay code for gay guys to let gay guys know you’re a gay guy.

      There is a big photo at the top of the article of the suspect laying face down handcuffed on the floor. It would seem to me that if you try to assassinate the President and you don’t get shot you at least get dog piled by everyone on the police force, you get cuffed and whisked away to solitary. He got treated like a shoplifter that stole a canned ham from Dollar General.

      In this case the uniformed cops milled about the area while some photographer got up close and personal getting a very odd photo of the suspect. This photo was all done by a script for certain “optics” reasons.

      Lastly the article said that the acting chief of police said the suspect was tackled. Why on earth was the active shooter suspect not ventilated? Dude had a shotgun. He should have looked like a block of Swiss cheese.

      1. Maybe he tripped or hit a wall or something and they took their chance and tackled him. Wonder if there is more security camera footage of that part.

8. Beyond what you are pointing out are a few points outlined by a former SF utoober. The designated cameramen in the entire episode were calm and collected throughout, already had their phones in hand, and held their seats to film while the rest of the room fled or dove unter tables It was eerily similar to the way many filming in Butler seemed to be expecting something. Trump was whisked off the stage and then held for quite some time just behind the stage curtain, maybe it was a ballistic drapery. There were a Lot of big smiles by all in attendance at the hasty presser, including Melania. SF dude thought that was off FWIW. The manifesto reads like it was written by the same person who wrote the Alleged Charlie Kirk assassin’s manifesto. Way too much painfully unnecessary and self implicating detail. The last point is that Trump immediately claimed that none of this would have happened if he was able to have events like this in his White House ballroom. The same talking point was instantly repeated by dozens of “conservative” influencer types all over social media.
   Not sure if it was the same guy, but the point was also made that the IDF connection could be a message from Bibi that the war is not to be stopped. Is any of that true or significant? Who knows? Everything is fake and ghey now anyway. I do know that when Butler happened there would have been civil war if he had been killed. Now I doubt that anyone outside of his 15% hard core believers would care.
   There was a film clip of the Butler shooting making the rounds just this past week. Might have even been the same ytube guy. The broader angle of the cameraman caught someone down in front of the stage usher a whole pack of photographers to stage right down in front as Trump was under the SS pig pile on stage. The crane conveniently dropped the US flag down low just overhead and behind, then Trump pops up from the scrum and fist pumps with the flag behind for all the aspiring Pulitzer Prize winners. If real, it looked artificial and staged to me.

9. The weirdest part of his screed to me was he explicitly gave Kash Patel. Huh?

   Did you catch that Jimmy Kimmel posted a parody WHCD address vid shortly before this?
   As the camera pans across to Melania and Barron, he’s saying “And of course, our first lady Melania is here. Look at [so] beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow.” around the 8” mark. Talk about shit timing by a shitty person.
   The whole thing is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GRjKhsJc95o

   Kimmel is going to Kimmel. Back to why Patel?

10. *gave KashPatel a pass..d’oh

11. A couple observations:
    Anyone notice Trump was the last protectee removed from the head table, Vance was the first,WTF? That’s contrary to all PST rules of the game. The primary is always first to safety above all others. I also find as I watch all these incidents happen that the SS is THAT incompetent over and over and over.
    AS for lefty’s being familiar with guns now. I’m seeing more and more of them here in Colorado at ranges and training classes. Their groups are also getting private instructions from former military using ranges facilities that they reserve for a day or so. So if anyone thinks they are easy targets you better rethink that pronto. Do a little intel gathering by taking a look at some of the lefty gun groups sites, you will be real surprised.

12. The Kamala supporter could carry a .50cal?
    Does anyone really care about Cheeto the Pedo?
    Any male Kamal supporter=genetic misfire.
    It’s weird? Good thing you’re pro. (H/T-Hunter S)

    1. lol “weird times”!!
       That’s Hunter. Just watched the Gonzo doc. Almost made it to his funeral ceremony at Owl. He knew the score.

       Big, one last thought for ya about your situation. I remembered this joke after I read one of your recent posts: “What do you mean ‘we’ kemosabe?”

13. Of interest: How Remington Made Rifles & Shotguns (1969 Factory Film) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StRiRoiBdbE

14. Regarding the Browning M2, my Dad was a waist gunner in a B-17 in 1943 and that was the weapon he handled. Wearing a flight suit plugged in to the aircraft for heat, bulky gloves, oxygen mask and goggles. What a way to fly.

    I think the whole Press Club Dinner shooting event is total bullshit. If Trump thinks he’s that fucking cool, he needs private security everywhere at all times.

    Ever since they named John Wilkes Booth … well there’s the precedent. Except “John Hinkley Jr.” – but I guess “technically” that’s three words. Who cares.

15. Pingback: BCE: …And The Weirdness Keeps On Coming – Western Rifle Shooters Association

16. To be fair, most people have a middle name. I believe the subliminal trick is to tickle people’s memory of Lee Harvey Oswald, although at this point that is a diminishing return seeing as most folks under 50 can’t identify Oswald as Lincoln’s assassin.

17. so he runs past the cops with a shotgun? I can’t see a shotgun. then he shoots a cop in the chest with a shotgun??? but the cop is fine. Then we hear about 4 more shots ring out but then the dude is just laying on the carpet NOT SHOT without a shirt on. How did we go from he is shooting cops to dodging bullets to laying on the ground without a shirt? Makes zero sense. Someone rushing the gate is not a real attempt on anything but rushing the security. was not an assassination attempt. total clown world

18. No one mentions the agent reactions as the potential shooter sprints past the check point. The agent sees the interloper coming and actually backs up several steps and fumbles with finding and unholstering his sidearm. Why did he not physically engage the shooter? He had plenty of time and angle to just trip him, run into him, or tackle him. He’s being paid to do that sort of thing, ya know. A total puss out IMO. It would have been a nice ending for the shooter to have been shot himself rather than the SS spraying the walls and hitting one of their own! Maybe Trump should consider hiring a team of recently separated SEALs fresh from discharge.

19. Yaaawn…another scripted and contrived WCW Kayfabe style fake and gay political ‘assassination’ theater attempt to again misdirect and deceive the Uniparty indoctrinated conformie NPC’s from what’s really happening behind the stage…while trying to pump up attention and simpathy for the EpSTEIN linked Cheeto Pedo, aka ‘Catsup Ear’.

    That’s my take.
    NorthGunner – The Truth Is It’s OWN Defense!

    1. The most coherent, insightful, and honest comment on this entire “matinee” of theatre….smoke and mirrors….well done sir

20. Of interest: ATF unveils huge rule changes. https://x.com/ATFHQ/status/2049539067021254743

21. New head of ATF and Todd Blanche announce rollback of gun regulations — PBS is triggered. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-blanche-newly-confirmed-atf-head-cekada-propose-gun-regulation-rollbacks

22. Seems like every time this happens, SS and the rest have another chance to look kind of sloppy again. Leadership there needs a shake up. If wishes were conspiracy theories…………

Comments are closed.